Saturday, January 30, 2016

The Rule on Chain of Custody as Decided in One Case by the Supreme Court.

“We were just selling star apples” – this was the alibi of the appellants before the court when they were required to show their version of the alleged pot session incident against them.

In this 2015 case (January 14, 2015), the Supreme Court decided a case concerning two appellants reported to have been engaged in a shabu pot session in Baranggay Cuyab, San Pedro, Laguna.

On 29 March 2005, at around 6:00 in the evening, a confidential informant reported to SPO3 Melchor dela Peña (SPO3 Dela Peña) of the San Pedro Municipal Police Station, San Pedro, Laguna, that a pot session was taking place at the house of a certain “Obet” located at Barangay Cuyab, San Pedro, Laguna. Upon receipt of the information, SPO3 Dela Peña formed a team to conduct police operations against the suspect. The team was composed of the confidential informant, PO2 Rommel Bautista (PO2 Bautista), PO3 Jay Parunggao (PO3 Parunggao), PO1 Jifford Signap and SPO3 Dela Peña as team leader.

Friday, January 29, 2016

Is Failure to Make Love During the Marriage a Ground to Declare a Marriage Void?


Will a marriage be properly declared a void marriage if the husband and wife fails to have sexual congregation during their marriage?

The Supreme Court answered this question in a decided 1997 case entitled “Chi Ming Tsoi vs. Court ofAppeals and Gina Lao-Tsoi”.

In the said case, the couple were married in May 22,1988 at the Manila Cathedral in Intramuros, Manila. Everything was like a normal wedding gathering thereafter. After the said important event, the couple went to the husband’s mother’s house. Of course, at this moment, a honeymoon is expected of the couple.

But this did not happen.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Welcome to PhilJurisDigest!

Welcome to Philippine Jurisprudence Digest.


Philippine Jurisprudence Digest is an online law blog that tackles Philippine cases/ jurisprudence. The Supreme Court from time to time decides numerous cases, some of which are relevant to one ordinary Juan. We have to admit, some of the Supreme Court decisions affect us Filipinos as a nation, whether one is a CEO of a corporation in Makati or a jeepney driver in Espana, Manila. This law blog has the mission of dissecting these relevant cases in a form that is understandable to everyone.

May an Employee be Dismissed for Participating in Lewd Conversations in a Private Chatroom? Yes, according to the Supreme Court.

Does participating in profane conversations with co-workers using company resources during office hours and sending company information to o...